Agree on the question
Start each stage with the decision it needs to resolve. A research pass, a visual direction and a prototype should not all ask for the same kind of feedback. Make the purpose of the review clear before sharing the work.
Progress should be visible before the presentation.
Show enough context
Present the direction where it will be used. A type choice is easier to assess on a real heading and a small label than on an isolated specimen. Include the alternatives that explain the decision, without turning the review into an archive.
Carry the decision forward
Write down what was agreed and what is still open. Update the working source so the next stage begins from the same understanding. A clear process removes repeated explanation and gives the team more time for the details that matter.